User talk:Økonom
Welcome!
Hello, Økonom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 05:01, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
[edit]- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
[edit]- Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected
- News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
- Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
- Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
- Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
- Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
- Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
- News from the WMF: News from WMF
- Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
- Essay: How
- Humour: Village pump
- From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
[edit]- From the editors: Help wanted (still)
- News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
- Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
- Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Binge-watching
- Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
- Gallery: Signed with pride
- From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
- Humour: Pesky Pronouns
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
[edit]- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
- Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?
- In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
[edit]- News and notes: An Action Packed April
- In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?
- Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages
- Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art
- Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde
- Technology report: A new special page, and other news
- Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns
- News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?
- Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy
- From the archives: Portals revisited
The Signpost: 31 May 2019
[edit]- From the editors: Picture that
- News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections
- In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball
- Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
- Technology report: Lots of Bots
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey
- Essay: Paid editing
- From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
The June 2019 Signpost is out!
[edit]- Discussion report: A constitutional crisis hits English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Mysterious ban, admin resignations, Wikimedia Thailand rising
- In the media: The disinformation age
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Traffic report: Juneteenth, Beauty Revealed, and more nuclear disasters
- Technology report: Actors and Bots
- Special report: Did Fram harass other editors?
- Recent research: What do editors do after being blocked?; the top mathematicians, universities and cancers according to Wikipedia
- From the archives: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In focus: WikiJournals: A sister project proposal
- Community view: A CEO biography, paid for with taxes
The Signpost: 31 July 2019
[edit]- In the media: Politics starts getting rough
- Discussion report: New proposals in aftermath of Fram ban
- Arbitration report: A month of reintegration
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Community view: Video based summaries of Wikipedia articles. How and why?
- News from the WMF: Designing ethically with AI: How Wikimedia can harness machine learning in a responsible and human-centered way
- Recent research: Most influential medical journals; detecting pages to protect
- Special report: Administrator cadre continues to contract
- Traffic report: World cups, presidential candidates, and stranger things
The Signpost: 30 August 2019
[edit]- News and notes: Documenting Wikimania and our beginnings
- In focus: Ryan Merkley joins WMF as Chief of Staff
- Discussion report: Meta proposals on partial bans and IP users
- Traffic report: Once upon a time in Greenland with Boris and cornflakes
- News from the WMF: Meet Emna Mizouni, the newly minted 2019 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: Special issue on gender gap and gender bias research
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
The Signpost: 30 September 2019
[edit]- From the editors: Where do we go from here?
- Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
- Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
- News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
- Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
[edit]- In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
- Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
- Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
- Community view: Observations from the mainland
- Arbitration report: October actions
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
- Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
[edit]- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
[edit]- From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
- News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
- In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
- Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
- Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
- Technology report: User scripts and more
- Gallery: Holiday wishes
- Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
- From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report
Article improvement
[edit]Hello Økonom. Since you complained about this article, saying it contained bias, I would just really like to encourage to come help improving it :) You might have some suggestions--Marginataen (talk) 14:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- As I think you are aware, the fundamental problem of the article in question, Mikkel Bjørn, is that you created and keep editing it without disclosing your conflict of interest in the matter, cf. Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#User:Marginataen. This issue will not be solved by your continuing editing the article. --Økonom (talk) 08:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
That discussion, we will take at the noticeboard where you stated that the article "has a clearly positive bias, omitting criticism and serving effectively as a platform of Bjørn's views". You didn’t give examples, but as Wikipedia:NPOV is important to me, I would of course like you to help improve it when you say it is unbalanced and therefore surely must have something in mind. If you don't want to, that's your choice, but I also just find it a bit unusual to just throw accusations of bias at another editor (me) without being willing to engage in the article oneself. But hey, if the "fundamental problem" is not the text itself but rather who wrote it, that’s something we will discuss at the noticeboard.--Marginataen (talk) 10:16, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- I have not said that I am unwilling to improve the article. However, it is natural to solve the most important and ongoing problem related to the article first, as your COI issue will clearly also influence subsequent discussions of the article. Økonom (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Macroeconomics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Consumption and Output.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Macroeconomics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Overheating.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Editor's Barnstar | |
For improvement of our WP pages on money and banking. SPECIFICO talk 13:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC) |
- Thanks, SPECIFICO - I appreciate that a lot! --Økonom (talk) 18:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Danmarks udtræden af den Europæiske Union (EU)
[edit]What do you think about showing the article "Danmarks udtræden af den Europæiske Union (EU)" also in Danish? Wname1 (talk) 17:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- There existed such an article once on the Danish Wikipedia, but it was deleted, following a consensus decision (as seen here: da:Wikipedia:Sletningsforslag/Dansk tilbagetrækning fra EU), so it seems not relevant to raise the issue again. --Økonom (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's true. But it's also historic. That's 3.5 years old. The world is always turning around, especially in the political sphere. :-) Wname1 (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Greek withdrawal from the eurozone has more than 30 countries, so why not also write Danmarks udtræden af den Europæiske Union (EU) as well? Wname1 (talk) 18:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see any clear connection between the two - and there is no Greek euro withdrawal article on the Danish WP ... --Økonom (talk) 07:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Greek withdrawal from the eurozone has more than 30 countries, so why not also write Danmarks udtræden af den Europæiske Union (EU) as well? Wname1 (talk) 18:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's true. But it's also historic. That's 3.5 years old. The world is always turning around, especially in the political sphere. :-) Wname1 (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Draft help
[edit]Hello Økonom. It was actually quite a coincidence that you changed that image as I was just about to write to you. I've written a revision of the "Member of Folketing" sub-heading on MB's page. As you have shown intrest in that page in the past, I would like to ask if would like to read it and maybe give a little feedback before I submit it as a COI edit request in accordance with all rules? :)--Marginataen (talk) 19:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, I think that actively soliciting the assistance of other specific editors in making new suggestions for that page, as well as your misuse of sandboxes and your subsequent sockpuppet editing of Mikkel Bjørn's page, violates the topic ban given to you by Tamzin and Bishonen. You should rather respect your topic ban in its entirety. --Økonom (talk) 08:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I was just trying to be nice and solve possible disagreements/unconscious biases up front. I take your response as a no and that's perfectly alright :)--Marginataen (talk) 17:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)